Cases 131 - 140 of 1,276
Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc. v. PDR Network, LLC
as 22-1279
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLTON & HARRIS CHIROPRACTIC, INC., a West Virginia Corporation, individually and as the representative of a class of similarly-situated persons
Defendant / Appellee:
PDR NETWORK, LLC, PDR DISTRIBUTION, LLC, PDR EQUITY, LLC and others
In re Goldman Sachs Group, Inc
as 22-484
Plaintiff:
Pension Funds, Ilene Richman, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Pablo Elizondo and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Arkansas Teachers Retirement System, West Virginia Investment Management Board and Plumbers and Pipefitters Pension Group
Defendant:
Sarah E. Smith
Defendant / Appellant:
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Lloyd C. Blankfein, David A. Viniar and others
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly known as WELLPOINT INC doing business as Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company doing business as Blue Cross of California doing business as BLUE CROSS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA doing business as Blue Cross of Northern C, Independence Health Group Inc and Independence Hospital Indemnity Plan Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In the Matter of Big Scary Creek Landfill Site Putnam County, West Virginia: Putnam County Parcel Nos. 40-10-0225-0091-0001 and 40-10-0225-0091-0002
as 3:2022mc00032
In Re:
Big Scary Creek Landfill Site Putnam County, West Virginia: Putnam County Parcel Nos. 0091-0001 and 0091-0002
Petitioner:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
State of Louisiana v. Biden
as 22-30087
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Louisiana, by and through its Attorney General, Jeff Landry, State of Alabama, by and through its Attorney General, Steve Marchall, State of Florida, by and through its Attorney General, Ashley Moody and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States, Cecilia Rouse, in her official capacity as Chairwoman of the Council of Economic Advisers, Shalanda Young, in her official capacity as Acting Director of the Office of Management and Budget and others
Sierra Club v. West Virginia DEP
as 22-1008
Petitioner:
SIERRA CLUB, WEST VIRGINIA RIVERS COALITION, WEST VIRGINIA HIGHLANDS CONSERVANCY and others
Respondent:
WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and HAROLD WARD, in his official capacity as Secretary of the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection
Intervenor:
MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC
OH, et al v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 21-4235
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, JESSICA S. MARCELLA, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs, in their official capacities, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF ALASKA, STATE OF IDAHO and others
In Re Goldman Sachs Group
as 21-3105
Petitioner:
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Lloyd C. Blankfein, David A. Viniar and others
Respondent:
Arkansas Teachers Retirement System, West Virginia Investment Management Board and Plumbers and Pipefitters Pension Group
Louisiana et al v. Becerra et al
as 3:2021cv04370
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, U S Dept of Health & Human Services, Administration for Children & Families and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
US v. Cadden
as 21-2003
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
BARRY J. CADDEN
Interested Party:
MATTHEW CADDEN, EMILIA CADDEN, E. R. CADDEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
