Cases 11 - 20 of 24
IN RE: PACKAGED SEAFOOD PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 3:2015md02670
Plaintiff:
Truyen Ton-Vuong, Steven Kratky, Melissa Bowman and others
Defendant:
Big Catch Cayman LP, Dongwon Enterprises Co. Ltd., Chicken of the Sea International, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Non-Party Costco Wholesale Corporation, Lion Capital LLP and Christopher Lischewski
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States Department of Justice
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Affiliated Foods Plaintiffs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Gursheel Dhillon, et al v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, et al
as 15-2792
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GURSHEEL S. DHILLON, on behalf of the United States of America and all Health Related Plans that purchased Lidoderm and cash payers
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MAX H. WEATHERSBY, JR., ex rel. On behalf of the states of CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IL, IN, LA, MD, MI, MN, MT, NV, NJ, NM, NY, NC, OK, RI, TN, TX, VA, WI, and the DC. and MK LITIGATION PARTNERSHIP 2011 LLP, ex rel. On behalf of the states of CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IL, IN, LA, MD, MI, MN, MT, NV, NJ, NM, NY, NC, OK, RI, TN, TX, VA, WI, and the DC.
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, PEGGY RYAN, ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC and others
Gursheel Dhillon, et al v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, et al
as 14-3377
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GURSHEEL S. DHILLON, On behalf of the United States of America and all Health Related Plans that purchased Lidoderm and cash payers
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MAX H. WEATHERSBY, JR., ex rel., On behalf of the States of CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IL, IN, LA, MD, MI, MN, MT, NV, NJ, NM, NY, NC, OK, RI, TN, TX, VA, WI and the D.C., MK LITIGATION PARTNERSHIP 2011 LLP, ex. rel. On behalf of the states of CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IL, IN, LA, MD, MI, MN, MT, NV, NJ, NM, NY, NC, OK, RI, TN, TX, VA, WI, and the D.C. and PEGGY RYAN, United States of America ex rel. Peggy Ryan, States of: FL, NY, MA, CA, VA, DE, IL, NV, GA, HI, IN, MT, NH, NJ, NM, OK, RI, TEN, TX
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC, ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS HOLDINGS INC and others
Galbraith v. Medicare Secondary Payer Recovery Contractor (MSPRC) et al
as 1:2013cv00062
Plaintiff:
Susanne Galbraith
Defendant:
Medicare Secondary Payer Recovery Contractor (MSPRC), Centers For Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv03024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lindsey et al v. USAA Property and Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 5:2012cv00546
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Hunt Lindsey , Scott Smith and Frank Moreno
Defendant:
USAA Property and Casualty Insurance Company , Medicare Secondary Payer Recovery Contractor , Tricare Humana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PAYER v. BERRONES et al
as 1:2012cv01704
Plaintiff:
E.L. ARCHIE PAYER
Defendant:
A.J. BERRONES, A.J. BERRONES & ASSOCIATES, KEITH DOSS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
In The Matter Of The v. Payer
as 1:2012mc00077
Petitioner:
In the Matter of
Respondent:
Michele Lynn Payer
Aubert v. Chet Morrison Contractors, Inc.
as 2:2011cv02199
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Aubert
Defendant:
Chet Morrison Contractors, Inc.
Interpleader_plaintiff:
Chet Morrison Contractors, Inc.
Interpleader_defendant:
Tyrone Aubert, Johnny Rizzo Furniture, Inc., Internal Revenue Service and others
Movant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
The City of San Antonio et al v. Toshiba Corporation et al
as 5:2010cv00041
Defendant:
NRG Energy, Inc., Nina Texas 3 LLC, Nina Texas 4 LLC and others
Intervenor:
Rate Payer Protection Coalition
Plaintiff:
The City of San Antonio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
