Cases 31 - 40 of 3,629
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sibley v. Watches
as 24-855
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY
Defendant:
CHAUNCEY J. WATCHES, KATHLEEN HOCHUL, LETITIA JAMES and others
Suarez v. Sullivan
as 24-872
Plaintiff:
ELVIN SUAREZ
Defendant:
ROBERT MORTON, Superintendent, Downstate Correctional Facility, in his individual capacity, RYAN LAHEY, Office of Mental Health Unit Chief, Downstate Correctional Facility, in his individual capacity, ABADUL QAYYUM, Psychiatrist, Downstate Correctional Facility, in his individual capacity and others
Strickland et al v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Rusty Strickland, Alan and Amy West Farms, Alan West and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Thomas James Vilsack, Zach Ducheneaux and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Baker et al v. Ambasador Nursing and Rehab et al
as 4:2024cv10791
Plaintiff:
Richard Baker and Richard Perry
Defendant:
Ambasador Nursing and Rehab, Frank LNU, April LNU and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
JUMBA BAKER et al v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
COLLEEN JUMBA BAKER, BRITTANY MERCER, MATTHEW O'BRIEN and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH and MATTHEW LACKNER
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Jackson v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-1771
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JACKSON
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, in relation to The Nevada Department of Corrections, E K MCDANIEL, DWIGHT WALTER NEVEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
