Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Stanke et al v. Penloyd, LLC, et al
as 4:2009cv00140
Plaintiff:
Glenn C Willis, James D Miller, Paul H Holladay and others
Defendant:
Penloyd Holding, Inc., Paul Buttsburger, Paul Loyd and others
Trustee:
Trustee Patrick J. Malloy, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baker et al v. Durham
as 5:2010mc00058
Plaintiff:
Bradley J. Baker and Wade R. Wolf
Defendant:
Timothy S. Durham
Bradley J. Baker et al v. Obsidian Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2010mc00311
Plaintiff:
Bradley J. Baker and Wade R. Wolf
Defendant:
Timothy S. Durham and Obsidian Enterprises, Inc.
BAKER et al v. OBSIDIAN ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 1:2010mc00139
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY J. BAKER and WADE R. WOLF
Defendant:
TIMOTHY S. DURHAM and OBSIDIAN ENTERPRISES, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
B.C. Produce, Inc. v. Gary's Ultimate Fruit, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv11070
Plaintiff:
B.C. Produce, Inc.
Defendant:
Gary's Ultimate Fruit, Inc., Gary H. Baker and James J. Baker
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
United States of America v. Baker
as 10-1925
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Keith J. Baker
Bradley J. Baker et al v. Obsidian Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2010mc00160
Plaintiff:
Bradley J. Baker and Wade R. Wolf
Defendant:
Timothy S. Durham and Obsidian Enterprises, Inc.
Baker v. Actavis Totowa, LLC
as 2:2010cv00475
Plaintiff:
Betty J. Baker
Defendant:
Actavis Totowa, LLC
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777
Court:
Fourth Circuit
›
West Virginia
›
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Type:
Other Statutes
Baker et al v. Obsidian Enterprises Inc. et al
as 1:2010mc00053
Plaintiff:
Bradley J. Baker and Wade R. Wolf
Defendant:
Obsidian Enterprises Inc. and Timothy S. Durham
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
