Cases 31 - 40 of 1,308
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Baldwin v. Devine et al
as 2:2023cv04206
Plaintiff:
Laura Marie Baldwin
Defendant:
Joshua Calvin Devine doing business as Circuit Judge, Callaway County 13th Circuit Court, Kevin M J Crane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw v. McDonough
as 24-1070
Claimant:
ELAINE B. SHAW
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. et al v. D.E. Shaw & Co., L.P.
as 1:2023cv09158
Plaintiff:
SS&C TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.; and Advent Software, Inc.
Defendant:
D.E. Shaw & Co., L.P.
Shaw v. Enhanced Recovery Company
as 3:2023cv01075
Plaintiff:
DeJenea Shaw
Defendant:
Enhanced Recovery Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Jeremy Shaw
as 23-5896
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JEREMY SHAW
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
REHFELDT v. GREEN ARROW SOLUTIONS et al
as 1:2023cv01786
Plaintiff:
SARAH REHFELDT
Defendant:
GREEN ARROW SOLUTIONS doing business as GREEN ARROW LOANS, INTEGRA FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, NEVADA IMPACT MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bucks County Employees Retirement System v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv04175
Plaintiff:
Bucks County Employees Retirement System
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation, Alan H. Shaw, James A. Squires and others
Petitioner:
AkademikerPension and Ironworkers Locals 40, 361 & 417 Union Annuity, Pension and Topping Out Funds
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
