Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Two Madmen LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Two Madmen LLC d/b/a The Mad Hatter Neighborhood Pub and Christopher S. Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Saladino v. Mad City Home Improvement, LLC
as 0:2024cv01419
Plaintiff:
Alisha Saladino
Defendant:
Mad City Home Improvement, LLC doing business as Mad City Windows & Baths
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
United States of America v. Millet (Roman)
as 24-18
Defendant:
RICHARD MORALES, HECTOR LUIS RIOS, MARIA VIDRO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MANUEL E. ROMAN, Manny and Pito
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
HPX, LLC v. Creative Mad Systems, Inc.
as 1:2023cv05279
Plaintiff:
HPX, LLC
Defendant:
Creative Mad Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 09 Application for Confirmation of Arbitration Award
Rice v. Aristocrat Leisure Ltd et al
as 3:2023cv01334
Plaintiff:
Sera Stancil Rice
Defendant:
Aristocrat Leisure Ltd, Aristocrat Technologies Inc and Product Madness Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Mad Mobile, Inc. v. Meijer Great Lakes Limited Partnership
as 1:2023cv01020
Plaintiff:
Mad Mobile, Inc.
Defendant:
Meijer Great Lakes Limited Partnership
MIDNIGHT MADNESS DISTILLING LLC et al v. PARZYCH
as 2:2023mc00136
In Re:
MIDNIGHT MADNESS DISTILLING LLC
Plaintiff:
BONNIE B. FINKEL
Defendant:
CASEY PARZYCH, Gary Parzych, Ryan Uszenski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Withdrawal of Reference
Mad Dogg Athletics, Inc. v. Peloton Interactive, Inc.
as 23-2018
Appellant:
MAD DOGG ATHLETICS, INC.
Appellee:
PELOTON INTERACTIVE, INC.
Mad Dogg Athletics, Inc. v. Peloton Interactive, Inc.
as 23-2020
Appellant:
MAD DOGG ATHLETICS, INC.
Appellee:
PELOTON INTERACTIVE, INC.
US v. Johnl White
as 23-4325
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHNL KEITH WHITE, a/k/a Mad Max
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
