Real Property Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 93
USA, et al v. Ecology WA Dept of, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2001cv00047
Defendant: Karl J Schumak, Debra James, Paul E Longworth and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Not Classified By Court: Stephanie Stika
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Russ et al v. Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00187
Defendant: Schmidt & Stacey Consulting Engineers, Inc, Cartner Glass of Myrtle Beach, Inc, Royal Concrete, Inc and others
Plaintiff: Merle D Russ and Ellen Russ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
(UD)(PS) US Secretary of Housing and Urban Development v. Schmidt We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01644
Plaintiff: United States Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
Defendant: Edward Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
DI Kunkle Second Family Limited Partnership v. Barness et al
as 2:2019cv00960
Defendant: Alan Kunski, Marla Fidler, Stanley Cohen and others
Plaintiff: DI Kunkle Second Family Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Foret v. American Optical Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv01892
Plaintiff: Don James Foret
Defendant: Survivair, Inc., Louis M. Gerson, American Optical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conner v. Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv00357
Plaintiff: Katherine M. Conner and Katherine M. Schmidt
Defendant: Directions Equity, LLC, LoanCare LLC and Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schmidt v. APAC Mid-South, Inc.
as 4:2019cv00027
Plaintiff: David Schmidt
Defendant: APAC Mid-South, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Moutaw et al
as 5:2018cv00957
Defendant: Rachell Moutaw Rigney, Pottawatomie County Board of County Commissioners, Briana Moutaw Bridendolph and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Guardian Ad Litem: Joey D Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 3.31 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv01327
Defendant: 2.38 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Portage Des Sioux, City of, GULF CENTRAL PIPELINE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff: SPIRE STL PIPELINE LLC
Consolidated Defendant: 3.04 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, 0.28 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Louis County, State of Missouri, Capital Commerce Mortgage Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 0.69 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv01335
Defendant: Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Collector of Revenue of St. Charles County, 0.55 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff: Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?