Cases 21 - 30 of 777
TONEY v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 3:2019cv21972
Defendant:
PAUL MACARTHUR, JOHN AND JANE DOE 1-4 and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff:
RONETTA TONEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
MacArthur v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00781
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joyce MacArthur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abdou et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11856
Plaintiff:
Abdou Mohamed, Rodolfo Salcedo, John Hurley and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Douglas et al v. Snyder et al
as 2:2018cv11287
Plaintiff:
Willie Douglas , Etta Douglas , Charles Shehee and others
Defendant:
Richard Dale Snyder , City of Flint , Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanson v. Berry(CONSENT)
as 3:2018cv00428
Plaintiff:
Dennis Hanson
Defendant:
Macarthur Berry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MACARTHUR v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv13245
Plaintiff:
LYNN MACARTHUR
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and IMERYS TALC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MacArthur v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv13250
Plaintiff:
Cassandra MacArthur
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sandoz, Inc., Accord Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MacArthur v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv04160
Plaintiff:
Lois MacArthur
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gray v. MacArthur Company
as 5:2016cv05095
Plaintiff:
Robert Gray
Defendant:
MacArthur Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MacArthur et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv03385
Plaintiff:
William Alfred MacArthur and Dorothy Mary MacArthur
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
