Cases 31 - 40 of 176
Gall et al v. Sears Roebuck & Co et al
as 0:2015cv04837
Plaintiff:
Christian Gall and Cheryl Gall
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co and Icon Health and Fitness Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robertson v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv13713
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Robertson
Defendant:
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. and Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Deeds v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 4:2015cv02208
Plaintiff:
Judith Deeds and David Deeds
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation and Sears Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. et al
as 3:2015cv00513
Plaintiff:
Khadi Jones
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck & Co. , Nathaniel Ray and Does A, B, C and D
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stinchfield v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
as 1:2015cv00032
Plaintiff:
Thomas Stinchfield
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCuistian v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., et al.
as 1:2015cv00279
Plaintiff:
Richard Warren McCuistian
Defendant:
LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. , BRK Brands, Inc. and Sears Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kyles v. Sears Roebuck & Co et al
as 3:2015cv00151
Plaintiff:
Augustine Kyles
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co and Sears Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newcomb et al v. General Electric Company et al
as 1:2014cv00509
Plaintiff:
Edward Newcomb and Jeanine Newcomb
Defendant:
General Electric Company , Ingersoll Rand Company , Foster Wheeler Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Fleming v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
as 1:2014cv03435
Plaintiff:
Valerie Jennings Fleming
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Sanchez et al v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
as 1:2014cv23291
Plaintiff:
Yaicel Del La Caridad Sanchez and Aldo Arencibia
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
