Cases 61 - 70 of 257
Hopper v. KMART Corporation
as 6:2015cv00209
Plaintiff:
Robert Hopper
Defendant:
KMART Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Morales, et al. v. Kmart Corporation, et al.
as 1:2015cv08943
Defendant:
Kmart Corporation and Sears Holdings Management Corporation
Plaintiff:
Alex Morales and Marisol Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schmuckley v. Kmart Corporation
as 2:2015cv02307
Plaintiff:
Loyd F. Schmuckley, Jr.
Defendant:
Kmart Corporation
Intervenor_plaintiff:
United States of America and State of California
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Peek et al v. Kmart Corporation et al
as 6:2015cv04302
Plaintiff:
Barbara Peek and Gary Peek
Defendant:
Kmart Corporation and Schindler Elevator Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nielson v. Sears Holdings Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv02065
Plaintiff:
Janice Nielson
Defendant:
Kmart Corporation , Stanley Black & Decker Incorporated , Stanley Access Technologies LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Coleman v. Kmart Corporation
as 2:2015cv00992
Plaintiff:
Zena Coleman
Defendant:
Kmart Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hon v. Kmart Corporation et al
as 9:2015cv81060
Plaintiff:
Kimberly K Hon
Defendant:
Kmart Corporation and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GAMBILL v. KMART CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv00181
Plaintiff:
SHAKERIA GAMBILL
Defendant:
KMART CORPORATION and TECHNIBILT, LTD.
Cross_claimant:
TECHNIBILT, LTD. and KMART CORPORATION
Cross_defendant:
KMART CORPORATION and TECHNIBILT, LTD.
Mediator:
GARY EIBEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Kmart Corporation
as 7:2015cv00119
Defendant:
Kmart Corporation
Plaintiff:
Sandra Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Padgett et al v. Kmart Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00048
Plaintiff:
Tammy Padgett and Joey Padgett
Defendant:
Kmart Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
