Cases 1 - 10 of 350
Falcone v. Nestle USA, Inc.
as 24-6196
Respondent:
MARIE FALCONE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Petitioner:
NESTLE USA, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Coleman-Morales v. Nestle USA, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00516
Defendant:
Nestle USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sydnie Coleman-Morales
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Foster v. Nestle USA, Inc.
as 1:2024cv08536
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Foster
Defendant:
Nestle USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Anthony-Thomas Candy Company v. Nestle USA, Inc.
as 2:2024cv03938
Defendant:
Nestle USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anthony-Thomas Candy Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Brook + Whittle LTD v. Nestle USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00735
Defendant:
Nestle USA, Inc. and Fuji Seal International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brook + Whittle LTD
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Keith Feder, M.D., Inc. v. Nestle USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv06817
Defendant:
DOES 1-10 and Nestle USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Keith Feder M.D., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv03247
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
RIVERA v. ACE FIRE UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv02610
Defendant:
ACE FIRE UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY, NESTLE USA INC and SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC
Plaintiff:
EZEQUIEL RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Beam v. Nestle USA, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00251
Defendant:
Nestle USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Beam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
