Cases 41 - 50 of 69
Paul Logan v. Club Metro USA LLC, et al
as 15-3832
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PAUL LOGAN, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED
Defendant - Appellee:
CLUB METRO USA LLC, CLUB METRO USA FRANCHISING LLC, HFIG OLD BRIDGE LLC, DBA Club Metro USA Old Bridge and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ABC FINANCIAL SERVICES CO INC
Prestige Detailing, Inc. v. Logan Oil, Inc.
as 1:2015cv03412
Plaintiff:
Prestige Detailing, Inc.
Defendant:
Logan Oil, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Prestige Detailing, Inc.
as 8:2015cv03412
Plaintiff:
Prestige Detailing, Inc.
Defendant:
Logan Oil, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Transmission of Bankruptcy Reference
Logan et al v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
as 0:2015cv03794
Plaintiff:
Euolinda Rose Logan and James Henry Logan, Sr
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA, Wells Fargo & Company, John Stumpf and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOGAN v. CLUB METRO USA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY et al
as 2:2015cv06773
Plaintiff:
PAUL LOGAN
Defendant:
CLUB METRO USA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY , CLUB METRO USA FRANCHISING LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY , HFIG-OLD BRIDGE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Persinger v. J. & J., L.L.P.
as 5:2014cv00143
Plaintiff:
Logan M. Persinger
Defendant:
J. & J., L.L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03932
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Logan et al v. U.S. Bank NA
as 2:2013cv02075
Defendant:
U.S. Bank NA
Plaintiff:
Michael J Logan and Dayna Logan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Logan et al v. Victoria Townhomes et al
as 0:2013cv01778
Plaintiff:
Lewis J. Logan and Elizabeth W. Logan
Defendant:
Victoria Townhomes and Clifton Johnson
Logan Orion v. MetroPCS Wireless Inc et al
as 2:2013cv03881
Defendant:
Does and MetroPCS Wireless Inc
Plaintiff:
Logan Orion
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
