Cases 1 - 10 of 19
THE UROLOGY CLINIC, P.C. v. SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv18053
Plaintiff:
THE UROLOGY CLINIC, P.C.
Defendant:
SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INC. doing business as SHARP BUSINESS SYSTEMS and SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION doing business as SHARP BUSINESS SYSTEMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Macone v. Sharp Electronics Corporation
as 1:2019cv12021
Plaintiff:
Thomas Macone
Defendant:
Sharp Electronics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hamm v. Sharp Electronics Corporation
as 5:2019cv00488
Plaintiff:
Michael Hamm
Defendant:
Sharp Electronics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1711
James et al v. Sharp Electronics Corporation
as 2:2019cv03246
Plaintiff:
Jill Wittman and Nancy James
Defendant:
Sharp Electronics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAMMEY v. SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
as 3:2019cv00048
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN LAMMEY
Defendant:
SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haight v. Sharp Electronics Corporation
as 3:2019cv00371
Plaintiff:
Erin Haight
Defendant:
Sharp Electronics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown et al v. Sharp Electronics Corporation
as 3:2019cv00371
Plaintiff:
Jill Brown and Austin Russell
Defendant:
Sharp Electronics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POPEJOY et al v. SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
as 2:2014cv06426
Plaintiff:
JASON POPEJOY , JOE SAWYER and DANIEL SULLIVAN
Defendant:
SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Bankers Standard Insurance Company v. Sharp Electronics Corporation et al
as 7:2014cv08107
Plaintiff:
Bankers Standard Insurance Company
Defendant:
Sharp Electronics Corporation and General Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Popejoy et al v. Sharp Electronics Corporation
as 3:2014cv03495
Plaintiff:
Jason Popejoy , Joe Sawyer and Daniel Sullivan
Defendant:
Sharp Electronics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
