Cases 91 - 100 of 751
Kyle v. Saiz et al
as 5:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
LaTonya Yvette Kyle
Defendant:
Lawrence P Saiz, B Sigala, M Duke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Duke University Hospital N.C. et al
as 3:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Duke University Hospital N.C., CDC Gov, U.S. Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Duke CA Investment LLC et al
as 8:2021cv02135
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
DUKE CA INVESTMENT LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Forrester v. Storen et al
as 4:2021cv00164
Plaintiff:
Tony G. Forrester
Defendant:
S. Duke Storen, Victory Ann Latham and Teara S. Dargan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv04070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Duke v. Neronha
as 1:2021cv00435
Petitioner:
Gordon Duke
Respondent:
Peter Neronha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Lusa et al v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2021cv00813
Plaintiff:
Yananta Isi Chito Lusa, Wild Fire, Hakeem Shabazz-El and others
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Donna Scott Davenport and Lynn Dukes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dukes v. Rogers
as 1:2021cv04397
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Dukes
Defendant:
William H. Rogers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thurman v. Duke et al
as 2:2021cv00148
Plaintiff:
James W Thurman
Defendant:
Williamt Duke, Greg Earps, McMinn County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
