Cases 11 - 20 of 224
John and Jane Parents 1 v. Montgomery County Board of Education
as 22-2034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN AND JANE PARENTS 1 and JOHN PARENT 2
Defendant / Appellee:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, SHEBRA L. EVANS, individually and in their official capacity as Member of the Montgomery County Board of Education, BRENDA WOLFF, individually and in their official capacity as Member of the Montgomery County Board of Education and others
Amicus Curiae:
PACIFIC JUSTICE INSTITUTE, DR. ERICA E. ANDERSON, JEWISH COALITION FOR RELIGIOUS LIBERTY and others
Derek Tucson, et al v. City of Seattle, et al
as 23-35449
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DEREK TUCSON, ROBIN SNYDER, MONSIEREE DE CASTRO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF SEATTLE
Defendant:
ALEXANDER PATTON, TRAVIS JORDAN, DYLAN NELSON and others
Amicus Curiae:
WASHINGTON STATE ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAL ATTORNEYS, AND THE INTERNATIONAL MUNICIPAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION and KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC DEFENSE
Cambridge Christian School, Inc. v. Florida High School Athletic Association, Inc.
as 22-11222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAMBRIDGE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
FLORIDA HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, INC.
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Amicus Curiae:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, ASSOCIATION OF CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INTERNATIONAL, FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC., and others
Ryan v. DeMaria, et al
as 22-1513
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES P. RYAN
Defendant / Appellee:
CARLO DEMARIA, JR., Mayor, City of Everett, JAMIE RUSSO, then-Director of Constituent Services, DEBRA J. BRETON, Past Attorney/Mortgage Broker and others
Defendant:
ROBERT GREENE, Suffolk County Assistant District Attorney
Carson, et al v. Makin
as 23-1436
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAVID CARSON, as parent and next friend of O.C., AMY CARSON, as parent and next friend of O.C., ALAN GILLIS, as parent and next friend of I.G. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
A. PENDER MAKIN, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Department of Education
Interested Party:
AGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MAINE and others
Brooke Henderson, et al v. Springfield R-12 School District, et al
as 23-1880
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brooke Henderson and Jennifer Lumley
Defendant / Appellee:
Springfield R-12 School District, Board of Education, of the Springfield R-12 School District, Grenita Lathan and others
Defendant:
Martha Doenning
Appellant:
Americans for Prosperity Foundation, Alliance Defending Freedom, Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression and others
Speech First v. Shrum
as 23-6054
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SPEECH FIRST, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
KAYSE SHRUM, in her official capacity as President of Oklahoma State University
Petitioner:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OKLAHOMA, CATHOLICVOTE.ORG EDUCATION FUND and others
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTH CAROLINA v. STEIN et al
as 1:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTH CAROLINA
Defendant:
JOSHUA STEIN, SATANA DEBERRY, AVERY MICHELLE CRUMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bostick & Associates Business and Legal Consulting Group, LLC v. Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, et al
as 1:2022cv02505
Defendant:
Maryland, Grace Communion International, Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences and others
Plaintiff:
Bostick & Associates Business and Legal Consulting Group, LLC, Christina J. Bostick, C.B.T. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2520 Civil Damages for Interception Wire or Oral Communications
William Burrell, Jr., et al v. Tom Staff, et al
as 21-2846
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM L. BURRELL, JR., JOSHUA HUZZARD and DAMPSEY STUCKEY
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM STAFF, Individually, LOUIS DENAPLES, individually, DOMINICK DENAPLES and others
Appellant:
ANTHONY CRAVATH, ANTHONY JOHN GOODWIN, JR., DERRICK M. LAKE and others
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
