Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10330
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freedom From Religion v. Chino Valley Uni. Sch. Dist., et al
as 16-55425
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
CHINO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, JAMES NA, Chino Valley Unified School District Board of Education Board Member in his official representative capacity, SYLVIA OROZCO, Chino Valley Unified School District Board of Education Board Member in her official representative capacity and others
Intervenor:
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION and ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION MEMBERS KEN WILLIAMS, MARI BARKE, LISA SPARKS, JOHN BEDELL, REBECCA GOMEZ, IN THEIR OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITIES
Amicus Curiae:
JUSTICE AND FREEDOM FUND, ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM, AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE and others
State of Hawaii v. Trump
as 1:2017cv00050
Defendant:
Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Donald J. Trump and others
Plaintiff:
State of Hawaii, Ismail Elshikh, Muslim Association of Hawaii, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Rabbi Joel Mosbacher, State of Oregon, American Center for Law and Justice and others
Intervenor:
Frederick Banks, Ph.D. Vincent Lucas, Joseph Camp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendment
International Refugee Assistance Project et al v. Trump et al
as 8:2017cv00361
Plaintiff:
International Refugee Assistance Project , HIAS, Inc. , Allan Hakky and others
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump , Department of Homeland Security , Department of State and others
Amicu:
Harvard Immigration and Refugee Clinical Program , Anti-Defamation League , Jewish Council for Public Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State of Washington, et al v. Donald J. Trump, et al
as 17-35105
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON and STATE OF MINNESOTA
Intervenor - Pending:
DAVID GOLDEN
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, REX W. TILLERSON, Secretary of State and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF HAWAII
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES AND OTHER BUSINESSES, FRED KOREMATSU CENTER FOR LAW AND EQUALITY, LAW PROFESSORS AND CLINICIANS and others
Freedom From Religion v. Chino Valley Uni. Sch. Dist., et al
as 16-55425
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
CHINO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, JAMES NA, Chino Valley Unified School District Board of Education Board Member in his official representative capacity, SYLVIA OROZCO, Chino Valley Unified School District Board of Education Board Member in her official representative capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
JUSTICE AND FREEDOM FUND, ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM, AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
David Tenenbaum, et al v. U.S. Department of Defense, et al
as 09-1992
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID AARON TENENBAUM and MADELINE GAIL TENENBAUM
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN CENTER FOR CIVIL JUSTICE, ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE and AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF JEWISH LAWYERS AND JURISTS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Supporting Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-20091
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
