Cases 11 - 20 of 189
(PS) Murphy v. Dollar General Corp.
as 2:2023cv01715
Plaintiff:
Shannon O. Murphy, Sr.
Defendant:
Dollar General Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
Greene v. Noxubee County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv00288
Plaintiff:
Byron Darius Greene
Defendant:
Noxubee County, Mississippi, The Town of Shuqualak, Mississippi, The City of Brooksville, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Sorensson v. Dollar General Corporation
as 4:2023cv00011
Defendant:
Karolina Sorensson and Dollar General Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Husar v. Dollar General Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Norman Husar
Defendant:
Dollar General Corporation and Dolgencorp, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
