Cases 11 - 20 of 44
ADAMS v. HEAD et al
as 1:2021cv02670
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Defendant:
CHRIS HEAD, JOHN EOFF, MARY JEAN CREAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Allen et al
as 2:2021cv01160
Plaintiff:
Shantae Marie Phillips
Defendant:
Candra Allen, Tiana Allen, Davisha Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv14455
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Coleman et al v. Detroit Medical Center et al
as 2:2020cv11958
Defendant:
Detroit Medical Center, James Lewis, La'Quesha Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Laron Richardson and Lanora Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nemes et al v. Bensinger et al
as 3:2020cv00407
Defendant:
Sarah Rogers, Marilyn Dishman, Jack Snograss and others
Plaintiff:
Ken Kearns, Erik Hermes, James "Rich" Howland and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Keisha Dorsey
Intervenor:
Amy McGrath for Senate, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EYAJAN v. STATE OF OHIO et al
as 1:2019cv00161
Defendant:
KIM KOSKI, GERALD L. HEINBAUGH, MARY SPRINGER and others
Plaintiff:
SHEILA M. EYAJAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Schoenborn v. Deschutes County Health Services Department et al
as 6:2017cv00493
Defendant:
Deschutes County Health Services Department, Rebecca Elger, Lori Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Schoenborn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv11086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Vulliet v. Kautz et al
as 6:2016cv00302
Defendant:
Tammy Baney, Kate Brown, Laurie E. Craghead and others
Plaintiff:
Charles F Vulliet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
