Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Poindexter et al v. Strach
as 5:2018cv00366
Plaintiff:
Constitution Party of North Carolina, Gregory Holt, Jerry Jones and others
Defendant:
Kim Westbrook Strach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bush v. Jones et al
as 3:2017cv02036
Plaintiff:
Marcus Bush
Defendant:
Jerry Jones, Lydia Romero and DOES 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181
Jones v. The New York City Police Department
as 1:2015cv08274
Plaintiff:
Jerry Jones
Defendant:
The New York City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard et al v. Deal et al
as 2:2014cv00179
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Nathan Deal, Doug Collins, G.B.I. Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard et al v. Collins et al
as 2:2014cv00111
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Doug Collins, Nathan Deal, Casey Cagle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv07380
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer Matthew Grady and John and Jane Doe 1 through 10,
Plaintiff:
Jerry Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Samantha Jones v. City of Charleston
as 12-1385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMANTHA JONES, Administratrix of the Estate of Jerry Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHARLESTON and CHRISTOPHER BURFORD
Jones v. City of Charleston et al
as 2:2011cv00612
Plaintiff:
Samantha Jones and Jerry Jones
Defendant:
City of Charleston and Christopher Burford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maynard, et al v. The Colorado Supreme Court, et al
as 11-1207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALISON MAYNARD and GERALD LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
THE COLORADO SUPREME COURT OFFICE OF ATTORNEY REGULATION COUNSEL, APRIL MCMURREY, JOHN GLEASON and others
Consol Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM LUCERO, DAVID R. LASS, KAREN ROMERO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
