Cases 11 - 20 of 786
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Zabala v. Milwaukee County Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2024cv00577
Plaintiff:
Aracelio Zabala
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Sheriff's Office, Milwaukee County, Sheriff Earnell Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tolliver (PS) v. Walmart Supermart Market et al
as 1:2024cv01232
Plaintiff:
Kamilah Tolliver
Defendant:
Walmart Supermart Market, Miley Cyrus, Dough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tolliver v. Assurance Wirless, T-Mobile et al
as 1:2024cv01235
Plaintiff:
Kamilah Tolliver
Defendant:
Assurance Wirless, T-Mobile, Kim Kardashian West, Kylie Jenner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 198
Alexander v. Joint Base Andrews et al
as 8:2024cv01240
Plaintiff:
Kurt Alexander
Defendant:
Joint Base Andrews, Secretary Frank Kendall, Jason Stack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Kendall Smith v. U.S. Judge Paula Xinis
as 24-1365
Plaintiff:
KENDALL R. SMITH
Defendant:
U.S. JUDGE PAULA XINIS, STATE OF MARYLAND and UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Lanier v. Barlow et al
as 2:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Kristi Lanier
Defendant:
Sheriff Jeff Barlow, Corporal B. A. Shinaberry, Deputy Kendal Ober and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ames v. Chisago County et al
as 0:2024cv01397
Plaintiff:
James Ames
Defendant:
Chisago County, Adam Cinelli, Matthew Jacobson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
