Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv01314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mark Brooks-Albrechtsen v. City of Indianapolis, et al
as 16-2660
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK A. BROOKS-ALBRECHTSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, MARION COUNTY, INDIANA, POLICE MERIT BOARD and others
Mark Brooks-Albrechtsen v. City of Indianapolis, et al
as 16-2485
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK A. BROOKS-ALBRECHTSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, MARION COUNTY, INDIANA, POLICE MERIT BOARD and others
Mark Brooks-Albrechtsen v. City of Indianapolis, et al
as 15-2150
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK A. BROOKS-ALBRECHTSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, MARION COUNTY, INDIANA, POLICE MERIT BOARD and others
BROOKS-ALBRECHTSEN v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2015cv00786
Plaintiff:
MARK A. BROOKS-ALBRECHTSEN
Defendant:
MARK A. BROWN, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, KATHLEEN L. DEPEW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Levine et al
as 1:2013cv21560
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Brown
Defendant:
Liz Levine and Rust Consulting LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
HAYNES et al v. THE CITY OF DURHAM, N.C. et al
as 1:2012cv01090
Defendant:
THE CITY OF DURHAM, N.C., MARK WENDELL BROWN, JR., DANNY REAVES and others
Plaintiff:
ROBYN HAYNES and ERIC JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.