Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Arnel Management Company v. Michael R. Collins et al
as 8:2013cv01963
Plaintiff:
Arnel Management Company
Defendant:
Michael R Collins, Does and Krystina Sweeney
Collins v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2013cv05444
Plaintiff:
Michael J Collins
Defendant:
State of Washington , State of Washington Department of L&I , Maria I Mcbride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1716
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Dupree v. Debourg et al
as 4:2012cv01921
Plaintiff:
Ebony L. Dupree
Defendant:
Miguel A. Debourg , Michael W. Betz , Robert C. Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Catanzaro v. Fischer et al
as 3:2012cv00862
Plaintiff:
Anthony P. Catanzaro
Defendant:
Nora Barry Fischer, Michael D. Collins, Patrick Rogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Collins v. State of Washington, et al
as 12-35244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. COLLINS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRIES, State of Washington and DAVID A. IVERSON
Liporto v. Collins et al
as 1:2012cv10319
Plaintiff:
Timothy Liporto
Defendant:
Michael P. Collins , William F. Scanlon, Jr. and City of Beverly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv06580
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Collins v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2011cv05594
Plaintiff:
Michael J Collins
Defendant:
State of Washington , State of Washington Department of Labor & Industries and David A Iverson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
