Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00285
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01144
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Joseph Antonio v. SSA Security, Inc.
as 13-1031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH ANTONIO, BULAN JULES-ANTONIO, MICHAEL CLARK and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK POTTS and TERRI ROOKARD
Defendant - Appellee:
SSA SECURITY, INC., d/b/a Security Services of America, SECURITY SERVICES OF AMERICA, LLC, ABM INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Defendant:
JEREMY DANIEL PARADY, PATRICK STEPHEN WALSH, MICHAEL MCINTOSH EVERHART and others
Sharon Smith v. Harold Powdrill et al
as 2:2012cv06388
Defendant:
Harold Powdrill and Zelma Powdrill
Plaintiff:
Sharon Smith
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv05207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Doe et al v. West Muskingum County Board of Education et al
as 2:2011cv00273
Plaintiff:
Student Doe and Mother Doe & Father Doe
Defendant:
West Muskingum County Board of Education , Bob Daniels , Dan Ankrum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv04505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Elizabeth Barrett v. State of California et al
as 2:2010cv02789
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Barrett
Defendant:
Does, Stephen W Mayberg, Sharon Smith Nevins and others
Tyler v. Graves et al
as 8:2009cv00361
Plaintiff:
Billy Tyler
Defendant:
Etta Graves, Sharon Smith, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
