Cases 11 - 20 of 142
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brandon Shay Franklin v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv06779
Plaintiff:
Brandon Shay Franklin
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, Los Angeles County District Attorneys Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00212
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hughes v. Internal Revenue Service Credit Department
as 1:2023cv01576
Petitioner:
Christopher Shay Hughes
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service Credit Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-30322
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
RANZY v. SHAY
as 1:2023cv00292
Plaintiff:
RASHAD C. RANZY
Defendant:
MICHAEL ROBERT SHAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lola's Rendezvous, Inc. et al v. Providence Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv00416
Plaintiff:
Lola's Rendezvous, Inc., Silhouettes, Miami Employment Inc. and others
Defendant:
Providence Police Department, City of Providence and Providence Board of Licenses
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04448
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
RANZY v. SHAY
as 1:2022cv00953
Plaintiff:
RASHAD C. RANZY
Defendant:
MICHAEL ROBERT SHAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Waintraub et al
as 1:2022cv05612
Plaintiff:
Florence F. Smith
Defendant:
Alan J. Waintraub, Esq., Shay Krausz and Mark Partnow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
