Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Smith v. Nerstad
as 0:2021cv01703
Plaintiff:
Derrick V Smith
Defendant:
Mr. Nerstad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Schoenfelder
as 0:2021cv01704
Plaintiff:
Derrick V Smith
Defendant:
Schoenfelder and Olmsted County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tandon et al v. Newsom et al
as 5:2020cv07108
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA, Jeffrey V. Smith, Sandra Shewry and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Wong, Carolyn Gannon, Julie Evarkiou and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kazalonis v. Harney County Oregon et al
as 2:2020cv01605
Defendant:
Charles V. Smith, Unknown Assistant District Attorney for Harney County Oregon, Brian J. Needham and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Kazalonis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Methodist Hospitals of Dallas et al
as 3:2020cv02799
Defendant:
S. Bachman (Badge # 519) Individually, Methodist Hospitals of Dallas d/b/a Methodist Charlton and d/b/a Methodist Health System Police Dept., V. Smith (Badge #492), Individually and others
Plaintiff:
Carol Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harrison v. Methodist Hospitals of Dallas et al
as 3:2020cv00247
Defendant:
Michael Olantunji, Methodist Hospitals of Dallas, V Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Carol Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00194
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2777
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1700
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
