Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Young et al v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2019cv00886
Plaintiff:
Latrice Robinson and Steven W. Young
Defendant:
John Doe Officer 2, XYZ Insurance Company, John Doe Officer 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02193
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kabler v. United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Local 1776 Keystone State et al
as 1:2019cv00395
Defendant:
Michael Newsome, Peg Rhodes, Wendell W. Young, IV and others
Plaintiff:
John R. Kabler, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young et al v. State of NH, Department of Administrative Services
as 1:2019cv00035
Defendant:
State of NH, Department of Administrative Services
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey W Young, Richard C Davis and Laurence M Steeves, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02302
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2017cv02789
Defendant:
Stephen Bellone, County of Suffolk, Nicholas Lorusso and others
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Laney v. Mueller et al
as 2:2016cv01481
Plaintiff:
Tonja Lynn Laney
Defendant:
Robert P Mueller, Rodney L Daughetee, Scott G Neibauer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv03455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Walter Young, Jr. v. Township of Irvington, et al
as 13-4353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER W. YOUNG, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON, IRVINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, HAROLD C. BORK, JR. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
