Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 103
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01127
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00451
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00869
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv12138
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv03657
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSADO v. ARAMARK et al
as 2:2014cv03033
Plaintiff: JUAN ROSADO
Defendant: ARAMARK , ARAMARK CORPORATION , ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES and others
Cross_claimant: KALU , CORIZON HEALTH, INC. , JAMES ARNONE and others
Cross_defendant: ARAMARK , ARAMARK CORPORATION , ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL FACILITY SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelby County, TN Justice Commission & Court Administrations et al v. Bey We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv02334
Plaintiff: Shelby County, TN Justice Commission & Court Administrations, Lee Coffrey, Earnestine Dorsey and others
Defendant: Maleik Ali Bey
Miscellaneou: Kevin Key
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03394
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00613
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1326
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?