Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Dermott v. Donahoe et al
as 2:2014cv00291
Plaintiff:
Tatyana V. Dermott
Defendant:
Patrick R. Donahoe, Chris Smith and Jennifer Breslin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Cass et al v. City of Abilene et al
as 1:2013cv00177
Plaintiff:
Tammy Cass , Marcus Cass , Matthew Cass and others
Defendant:
City of Abilene, Stan Standridge and Chris Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke et al v. Cosby et al
as 2:2013cv09645
Plaintiff:
Roy L. Cooke , Lisa Ross and Cooke Company, LLC
Defendant:
Abigail Cosby, Shirley Perrine, John Perrine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joy v. Georgia et al
as 2:2012cv12971
Plaintiff:
Clifford Jason Joy
Defendant:
Georgia, Eash, Wesch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Kimbril et al
as 2:2011cv00167
Plaintiff:
Chris - Smith
Defendant:
Chuck Kimbril , Tennessee Bureau of Investigation/State of Tennessee , Brian Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Evans et al v. MCM Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv04493
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Evans and Padraic (Pat) Lackey
Defendant:
MCM Construction, Inc. , Roadway Electric, LLC, Jim Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Betancourt v. Canyon County et al
as 1:2010cv00247
Plaintiff:
Aniceto Betancourt, IV
Defendant:
Canyon County, Canyon County Jail Deputies, Canyon County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Audrey Taylor v. NJ State, et al
as 09-3673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AUDREY CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NJ, ZELMA FABER, NJ BD OF EDUCATION and others
Audrey Taylor v. NJ State, et al
as 09-3671
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AUDREY CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NJ, STATE OF NJ, ZELMA FABER and others
Smith v. Curry et al
as 3:2009cv01997
Plaintiff:
Chris Smith
Defendant:
Ben Curry, Rivero, S. Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
