Cases 21 - 30 of 161
Jones-Bey v. Chen
as 22-2019
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SISTER E. JONES-BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
PAMELA K. CHEN, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, LETITIA JAMES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1515
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1430
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Chang v. Vanderwielen et al
as 2:2022cv00657
Plaintiff:
Vicki Chang
Defendant:
Andrew Vanderwielen, Brian Hunt, Jane Gurevich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mumford v. Bostic et al
as 7:2021cv00598
Plaintiff:
Paul Mumford
Defendant:
J.D. Bostic, Colonel Gary T. Settle, D.A. Lockliear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flaherty v. Office of Juvenile Affairs et al
as 5:2021cv00871
Plaintiff:
Jamie Flaherty
Defendant:
Office of Juvenile Affairs, Danny Hall, Thomas Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peters v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv04366
Plaintiff:
Tarrill Peters, Jr
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, COOK COUNTY, a municipal corporation,, Sergeant Michael Petraski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sister E. Jones-Bey v. Chen et al
as 1:2021cv06142
Plaintiff:
Sister E. Jones-Bey
Defendant:
Pamela K. Chen, Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General Letitia James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Sister E. Jones-Bey v. Chen et al
as 3:2021cv00256
Defendant:
Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Pamela K. Chen, Attorney General Letitia James and others
Plaintiff:
Sister E. Jones-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
