Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Jennifer Clarke v. Bridge City Indep School Dist, et al
as 14-41443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JENNIFER CLARKE
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIDGE CITY INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, MIKE KING, Individually, RICHARD BRIGGS, Individually and others
Runco Transportation, Inc. et al v. Mid Valley School District. et al
as 3:2014cv01261
Plaintiff:
Runco Transportation, Inc. , Michael Runco , Randy Parry and others
Defendant:
Mid Valley School District, Cathy Jones, Borough of Throop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Toenniges v. Keith Jones, et al
as 14-10522
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD W. TOENNIGES
Defendant - Appellee:
KEITH JONES, SMITH, CALHOUN SP WARDEN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-3187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Clarke v. Bridge City Independent School District et al
as 1:2013cv00555
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Clarke
Defendant:
Bridge City Independent School District , Mike King , Richard Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2809
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Montclair Police Officers Association et al v. City of Montclair et al
as 2:2012cv06444
Plaintiff:
Deborah Camou and Montclair Police Officers Association
Defendant:
City of Montclair, Does, Keith Jones and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
JONES v. METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF DECATUR TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2012cv00650
Defendant:
SUSAN ADAMS, JEFFREY BAER, JOHN BAILEY and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
