Cases 21 - 30 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BREWER v. WRAY et al
as 1:2023cv00415
Plaintiff:
DENNIS SHELDON BREWER
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER WRAY, KIMBERLY CHEATLE, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Wilkins et al v. Austin III et al
as 1:2022cv01272
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH WILKINS, CAROL COE, NATALIE NOE and others
Defendant:
LLOYD AUSTIN III, Christine Wormuth and Lloyd Austin, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Ronald Emrit v. United States Naval Intelligence
as 22-2149
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES NAVAL INTELLIGENCE, LLOYD AUSTIN, Secretary and PENTAGON/ DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Emrit v. United States Naval Intelligence et al
as 1:2022cv02821
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
United States Naval Intelligence, Lloyd Austin and Pentagon/Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-55998
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Perri v. Obama et al
as 3:2022cv05655
Plaintiff:
Anthony S Perri
Defendant:
Barack Hussein Obama, Joseph Robinette Biden, Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perri v. Obama et al
as 2:2022cv01237
Plaintiff:
Anthony S Perri
Defendant:
Barack Hussein Obama, Joseph Robinette Biden, Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
