Cases 21 - 30 of 1,206
Warren v. Handy et al
as 3:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Tinika SeCal Warren and Tinika Se'Cal Warren
Defendant:
Maurice Handy, Regina Montgromery, Lynn Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGill v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2023cv24916
Plaintiff:
Rodney Maurice McGill, Sr.
Defendant:
United States Attorney General and The Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
McGill v. Wells Fargo Bank N/A
as 1:2024cv20473
Plaintiff:
Rodney Maurice McGill, Sr.
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank N/A
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SYMONETTE v. DENEEN
as 4:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
MAURICE SYMONETTE
Defendant:
ANDREW DENEEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter et al v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2023cv01548
Plaintiff:
Michael Carter, Brian Cosby, Ernest Snipes and others
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, City of St. Louis Refuse Division and Timothy Banta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Vaughn v. Jack Cleveland Casino, LLC
as 1:2023cv02338
Plaintiff:
Julius Maurice Vaughn
Defendant:
Jack Cleveland Casino, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Woloszyn et al v. County of Tioga et al
as 3:2023cv01585
Plaintiff:
Aimee Rice, Terry Ann Woloszyn, Esther Haines and others
Defendant:
County of Tioga and James McFadden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hooker v. Obbissit et al
as 1:2023cv05928
Plaintiff:
Maurice Darrell Hooker
Defendant:
Michael D. Obbissit, Terra Rollins, Linda Slaughter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
