Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Shelton v. McLeod County
as 0:2016cv00466
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Shelton
Defendant:
McLeod County , McLeod County Jail , Scott Rehmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SREAM v. TOWAMENCIN TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2015cv05671
Plaintiff:
PHRIRA SREAM
Defendant:
TOWAMENCIN TOWNSHIP , JOHN WITTENBERGER , GARY WAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Dillard v. Local Social Security Office et al
as 4:2014cv00090
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Dillard
Defendant:
Local Social Security Office, Amy Green, Bill Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dillard v. Local Social Security Office et al
as 3:2014cv00480
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Dillard
Defendant:
Local Social Security Office, Amy Green, Bill Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Talev et al v. Malivuk et al
as 5:2013cv02570
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Talev and Ryan Christopher Richardson
Defendant:
John Malivuk and Summit Testing and Inspection Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2510
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv00048
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Watkins v. United States Armed Force
as 12-3314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tony Dugal Watkins
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Armed Forces, Army EUSA Camp, Humphreys, Korea, CSC 138th INF, Korea, John H. Berger, MSG, AFEES and others
Van Meter v. County of Hancock, Ohio et al
as 3:2012cv01805
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Van Meter
Defendant:
County of Hancock, Ohio, Hancock County Sheriff's Office, Michael E. Heldman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
