Cases 21 - 30 of 1,023
Rosetti et al v. County of Cayuga
as 5:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Catherine Rosetti, Lonnie Pittsley, Samantha Boyce and others
Defendant:
County of Cayuga and David Dempsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hardt v. City of Portland
as 3:2023cv01980
Plaintiff:
Dale Everett Hardt and Scott Whitish
Defendant:
City of Portland, Mingus Mapps, Ted Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gurkirn Hundal v. Ruben Islas et al
as 2:2023cv10201
Plaintiff:
Gurkirn Hundal
Defendant:
Ruben Islas, Marth Enriquez, Joel Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hyde Rhodes v. Wilcox
as 24-1224
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIM HYDE RHODES
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE JEFFREY WILCOX, JUDGE JAY WINWARD, STATE OF UTAH and others
Hyde Rhodes v. Barney
as 24-1226
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIM HYDE RHODES
Defendant / Appellee:
TED BARNEY and KAYLA CORPENBARGER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1988 Proceedings in Vindication of Civil Rights
Luke Reed v. Joe Stewart, et al
as 23-6016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUKE DAVISON REED
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE STEWART, Ted Lavit Law Firm and KALEN REED, Circuit 11 Judge
Lipka et al v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2023cv01690
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lipka, Lipka Family, Rayna Montgomery and others
Defendant:
City of Portland, Gregory Adrian, Jerrold Higginborn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hoffman v. Tatum et al
as 1:2023cv01517
Plaintiff:
Garrett Hoffman
Defendant:
Mark Tatum, Ted Tidmore, Justin Rufo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hyde-Rhodes, et al v. Idaho Health Welfare, et al
as 23-4136
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIM HYDE-RHODES
Plaintiff:
TED HYDE-RHODES
Defendant / Appellee:
IDAHO HEALTH WELFARE, ROBERT CROWLEY, Magistrate Judge, JIM MASON, Casa 7 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
