Cases 21 - 30 of 17,536
Lin v. Wray
as 24-10420
Plaintiff:
Ke-Wei Lin
Defendant:
Christopher Wray, United States Department of Justice, (CA), Chad Yarbrough and others
Armendariz, et al v. City of Colorado Springs, et al
as 24-1201
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE ARMENDARIZ and CHINOOK CENTER
Defendant:
CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, DANIEL SUMMEY, in his individual capacity, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Gilbert v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Kosciuszko Gilbert
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
SINGH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv06027
Plaintiff:
PRABHJOT SINGH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COLETTE PETERS, RACHEL THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv06025
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COLETTE PETERS, RACHEL THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv02055
Plaintiff:
Brenda Butler Bryant
Defendant:
United States and Wil-lie Cop-e-land
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Justin Shaffer v. Daryl Bloom, et al
as 24-1828
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN ERIC SHAFFER
Defendant:
DARYL F. BLOOM, Assistant Supervisor Attorney Prosecutor, CARLO D. MARCHIOLI, Assistant USA Attorney, JOHN C. GURGANUS, JR., United States Attorney (Primary Defendant) and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shaw v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv02309
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Deshuna Shaw
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, Memphis Police Internal Affairs Bureau, Tennessee Highway Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alan v. United States of America IRS
as 6:2024cv06290
Plaintiff:
David P. Alan
Defendant:
United States of America IRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
