Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Tessema v. United States Department of the Navy et al
as 8:2016cv00359
Plaintiff:
Ezra T. Tessema
Defendant:
United States Department of the Navy and Veterans Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Taylor, Sr. v. Dept. of the U. S. Navy
as 15-1840
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS LEON TAYLOR, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, U.S. MARINE CORPS and THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS' AFFAIRS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-60212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams v. United States Department of the Navy et al
as 5:2014cv00430
Plaintiff:
Andrew L Williams
Defendant:
United States Department of the Navy, Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Veterans Central Arkansas Health Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosenberg v. Mabus et al
as 2:2014cv01507
Plaintiff:
Abigail Rosenberg
Defendant:
Raymond E Mabus , United States Department of the Navy and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ray Leonard, et al v. DOD, et al
as 14-5136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Father Ray Leonard and Fred Naylor
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Defense, Chuck Hagel, United States Department of the Navy and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv05994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
LEONARD et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2013cv01571
Plaintiff:
RAY LEONARD and FRED NAYLOR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, CHUCK HAGEL, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-30986
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
