Cases 31 - 40 of 265
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35508
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams v. Carver et al
as 6:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Michael Deshaun Williams
Defendant:
Frederick Carver, Trane Technologies Company LLC and Ingersoll Rand Inc/PLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
DUNLAP v. BARRICK, OFFICER et al
as 2:2022cv10553
Plaintiff:
IMANI DUNLAP
Defendant:
ZACHARY BARRICK, OFFICER, CHRIS RABION, OFFICER, R. CARTER, OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. State Of Texas et al
as 4:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
Autry Lee Jones
Defendant:
State Of Texas, Levin & Atwood, L.L.P, Carver L. Henry & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clervrain v. Shafer et al
as 1:2022cv00001
Defendant:
Peter B. Rutledge, David Shafer, Yang Yuanqing and others
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wade v. Nitti et al
as 6:2021cv06726
Plaintiff:
William Van Wade
Defendant:
John Nitti, Gregory Carver, Rodney Mastrosimone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Federoff et al v. Geisinger Clinic et al
as 4:2021cv01903
Plaintiff:
Theodore Federoff, Christine Baron, Melissa Barron and others
Defendant:
Geisinger Clinic, Geisinger Medical Center, Geisinger Health Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lindberg v. Lemonidis et al
as 6:2021cv01783
Plaintiff:
Lena Marie Lindberg
Defendant:
Robin C. Lemonidis, Lori Todd, F. Barberi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
