Cases 31 - 40 of 5,722
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Oliveira v. Edwards et al
as 4:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Amanda M. Oliveira
Defendant:
Brenda Edwards, Tammy Garland-Gay, Kiewanna Hills and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Michael Harrison v. In-N-Out et al
as 8:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HARRISON
Defendant:
IN-N-OUT, a Business Entity, IN-N-OUT BURGERS, a California Corporation and MGP FUND X LAGUNA HILLS LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brown et al v. The Hill Apartments et al
as 3:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Heidi Brown and Eminence Healthcare Staffing Agency LLC
Defendant:
The Hill Apartments, Bradley Company and Notre Dame Indiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melvin Gibbs v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 24-1262
Appellant:
M. EUGENE GIBBS and MELVIN EUGENE GIBBS
Defendant:
NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Plaintiff:
KRISTOFFER HICKS, LAQUITA OLIVER, CHERELLE JACOB and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
