Cases 41 - 50 of 1,571
barclay et al v. dixon et al
as 1:2023cv10272
Plaintiff:
leshawn maurice barclay
Defendant:
webb, jeremiah darnell Estate et al, barclay, noah sencer robert Estate et al, lynch, malakai levi Estate et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1996
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Lembert v. City of Sweetwater et al
as 1:2023cv24162
Plaintiff:
Marcial Lembert
Defendant:
City of Sweetwater, Alan Doe, Betty Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Tatum v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2023cv01088
Plaintiff:
Solen-keith and Solon Keith Tatum
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Traci L. Schenkle, Kent County Friend of the Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Nelson v. Town of Wayland Board of Health, et al
as 23-1823
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH TODD NELSON
Defendant / Appellee:
TOWN OF WAYLAND BOARD OF HEALTH, TOWN OF WAYLAND CONSERVATION COMMISSION, CHARLES SAMIOTES and others
Figueroa v. Darter et al
as 4:2023cv00871
Plaintiff:
Betty Figueroa
Defendant:
Margaret Darter, Krissy Lewis and Tommy Land
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
