Cases 41 - 50 of 2,133
Adimora-Nweke v. Harris County et al
as 4:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
Mr. Ernest Adimora-Nweke
Defendant:
Harris County, Houston Police Department, CWS Galleria, 5250 L.P. d/b/a "M5250" Apartments and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
PEDEN v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
DEANGELO PEDEN
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, CHIEF RANDAL TAYLOR, OFFICER BRENT TURNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vose et al v. County of Fulton et al
as 1:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Randall Vose, William Lander, II, Benjamin Steele and others
Defendant:
County of Fulton and Heather A. Scribner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Randall v. City of Las Vegas
as 2:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Ryan Kenneth Randall
Defendant:
City of Las Vegas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bose et al v. County of Dutchess
as 7:2024cv01333
Plaintiff:
Randall Lee Bose, Nancy Bose, Darlene Deary and others
Defendant:
County of Dutchess and Catherine Weisse, Director Real Property Tax Service Dutchess County in her Official Capacity Only
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Strong v. Shelter Plus Care et al
as 3:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Zachary Strong
Defendant:
Shelter Plus Care, Mecklenburg County, Kenya Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Villebrun v. Nienaber
as 0:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Anthony Randal-Ashley Villebrun
Defendant:
Brandon Keith Nienaber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joseph Wagner v. Lisa Scheirer, et al
as 24-1312
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wagner
Defendant:
Lisa Scheirer, Randall Hukreide, Scott Schroeder and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
