Cases 41 - 50 of 79
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Fuller, et al v. Davis, et al
as 14-4036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID FULLER, Grandparent and RUTH M. FULLER, Grandparent
Defendant - Appellee:
LYNN W. DAVIS, Honorable Judge, in his official and individual capacity, MARY NOONAN, Honorable Judge, in her official and individual capacity, JAY JENSEN, Dr. of ACAFS, (a/k/a the Family Academy) and others
Fuller et al v. Bartholomew et al
as 2:2013cv00375
Plaintiff:
David Fuller and Ruth M. Fuller
Defendant:
Lynn W. Davis , Mary Noonan , Jay Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00166
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights: Employment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Davis v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00446
Plaintiff:
Teresa W Davis
Defendant:
Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC, Cavalry SPV I, LLC, Louis Dardignac and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cornelius Hudson v. Fred Davi
as 12-11095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORNELIUS HUDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FRED W. DAVIS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
