Cases 41 - 50 of 1,600
Burnett v. Teton Prestress Concrete LLC, et al.
as 4:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
David Burnett
Defendant:
Teton Prestress Concrete, LLC and Hal Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Rankin et al v. City of Livingston, Texas et al
as 9:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rankin, Melanie Trimble and Brandon M. White
Defendant:
City of Livingston, Texas, Kaleb Barker, Ronnie Bogany and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simmons v. Edmond City of et al
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Glynn Simmons
Defendant:
Edmond City of, Anthony David Garrett, Oklahoma City City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Simmons v. Together Credit Union
as 4:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Allen Simmons
Defendant:
Together Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sutter & Gillham PLLC, et al v. Judy Henry, et al
as 24-1071
Plaintiff:
Sutter & Gillham PLLC, Luther Oneal Sutter and Lucien R. Gillham
Defendant:
Judy Simmons Henry, Jacob Post Fair, Scott A. Irby and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00037
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Coffee County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Justin Phillips
Defendant:
Coffee County, Tennessee, Steven Austin Qualls, Blake Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rowena Simmons v. Baltimore City Police Department
as 24-1019
Plaintiff:
ROWENA SIMMONS, Individually, and on behalf of the Estate of Darius Gore, GARY TYSON and RAYMOND B. HINTON
Defendant:
BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER FELIX TORRES, OFFICER JOHNTA GRAY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
