Cases 51 - 60 of 1,631
Smith v. Murray
as 2:2023cv01726
Plaintiff:
Linda Smith
Defendant:
Daniel Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Murray v. Michael Ostrowski, et al
as 23-2901
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID L. MURRAY
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL OSTROWSKI, Family Court Judge, DAVID RYAN NUSSEY, Attorney, ASHLEY BATTAGLIA, Salem County DCP&P Case Worker and others
Murray v. Darwent et al
as 5:2023cv00925
Plaintiff:
Sean Murray
Defendant:
Jeremy Darwent and Mary Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson, Jr. et al v. Murray et al
as 3:2023cv00902
Plaintiff:
Kinte J. Johnson, Jr. and Tristan T. Johnson
Defendant:
Dave Murray, Indiana State Police Officer and J Eagen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Christopher McCook v. Kimberley Baker Guillemet et al
as 2:2023cv08351
Plaintiff:
Christopher McCook
Defendant:
Kimberley Baker Guillemet, Jessica Field, Douglas Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
James Ison, et al v. Ethan Schulman, et al
as 23-16219
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES JEFFREY ISON and ISON LAW FIRM, PC
Defendant / Appellee:
ETHAN P. SCHULMAN, TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Loretta Murray, et al v. Frank Williams, et al
as 23-5856
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORETTA MURRAY and ROGER A. MURRAY
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANK WILLIAMS, MARK PEMBERTON, MARK N. FOSTER and others
Cuara R. v. Post District Residences et al
as 2:2023cv00651
Plaintiff:
Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant:
Post District Residences, Rescue Mission of SLC, Homeless Resource Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
