Cases 51 - 60 of 1,369
Rowe v. Judge Cristy Criag et al
as 2:2023cv01679
Plaintiff:
Michael Rowe
Defendant:
Judge Cristy Criag, Judge Natali Woods, Judge Jeannie Hua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hayes v. City of Houston et al
as 4:2023cv03782
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Hayes
Defendant:
City of Houston, Officer Clay Barnes and Officer Michael Daus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2005
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sanders et al v. Forrester et al
as 4:2023cv00676
Plaintiff:
Tracy L. Sanders and David L. Sanders
Defendant:
Reid K. Forrester, Shalonn K. Curls, Rodney J. Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Stewart, Timothy v. Hayes, Brian et al
as 3:2023cv00607
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Stewart, Sr.
Defendant:
Brian Hayes, Martin Natividad, Jessica Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TUNSTILL v. ONEIL et al
as 1:2023cv01541
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY TUNSTILL
Defendant:
CHUCK ONEIL, HAYES GIBSON and BEECHWOOD GARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tucker v. Prator et al
as 5:2023cv01069
Plaintiff:
Terry Tucker
Defendant:
Steve Prator, Kelli Hayes, Debra Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
MALEK v. DUFFY et al
as 2:2023cv04344
Defendant:
SAFE HORIZON, CORPORATION COUNSEL, MATTHEW DUFFY and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MALEK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
