Cases 51 - 60 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JESSEE v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2014cv00064
Defendant:
ANONYMOUS MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL, CLINTON BENNETT, JUSTIN BUCHANAN and others
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE F. JESSEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DOE #1 et al v. MCCRORY et al
as 1:2013cv00711
Defendant:
PAT MCCRORY, ROY A. COOPER, III, FRANK PARRISH and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE #1 , JOHN DOE #2 , JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Schutte v. Webster County, Kentucky et al
as 4:2013cv00090
Plaintiff:
Carol Schutte
Defendant:
Webster County, Kentucky, Terry Elder, Robert J. Robison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robison v. City of Santa Rosa et al
as 3:2013cv02443
Plaintiff:
Eldrick Emanuel Robison
Defendant:
City of Santa Rosa, Mark Maystrovich and Michael J. Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stier v. Perry et al
as 1:2013cv00412
Defendant:
Gregg Abbott, Austin Police Chief Art Acevedo, Shirley Arnold-Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Heather A. Stier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hicks v. Clark et al
as 1:2013cv00989
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hicks
Defendant:
Barry Clark, Sonia Arvanitis, Edward Boswell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Robison v. Doe et al
as 4:2012cv02205
Plaintiff:
Heather M. Robison
Defendant:
John Doe and St. Charles County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HENSON v. CITY OF GAINESVILLE et al
as 1:2012cv00040
Plaintiff:
THERESA LOREE HENSON
Defendant:
CITY OF GAINESVILLE and BRETT ROBISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
