Cases 51 - 60 of 111
Salma Agha-Khan, MD v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv03186
Defendant:
Kirk Edward Sherriff, Debbie Banducci, Barry L Goldner and others
Plaintiff:
Salma Agha-Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White et al v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2016cv06925
Plaintiff:
Anthony White and Naeem Scarborough
Defendant:
City Of New York, Jorge Tobon, Jeff Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. Black Lives Matter Organization et al
as 6:2016cv02599
Plaintiff:
Jack Logan
Defendant:
Black Lives Matter Organization, Patrisse Cullers, Opal Tometi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nadwornik v. Barry, Township of, et al
as 1:2016cv00478
Plaintiff:
Jack Nadwornik
Defendant:
Barry, Township of , Patrick Herson, Victor Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. City of Brundidge et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 2:2016cv00182
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Brundidge, Don C. Dickert, Joseph E. Faulk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEE v. MAINE GOVERNOR LEPAGE et al
as 2:2016cv00097
Plaintiff:
ALANE JOY LEE
Defendant:
MAINE GOVERNOR LEPAGE, SCARBOROUGH MAINE POLICE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY POLICE OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00650
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Bifford L Scarborough, Jr v. Thomas Elliott et al
as 2:2015cv09755
Defendant:
Charlie Beck, Thomas Elliott and Spoon Singh
Plaintiff:
Bifford L Scarborough, Jr
Michael Gregg-Wilson v. Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarbor
as 15-1699
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GREGG-WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP, SUE ERWIN HARPER, FOLEY & LARDNER and others
DOYLE v. TOWN OF SCARBOROUGH et al
as 2:2015cv00227
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DOYLE
Defendant:
TOWN OF SCARBOROUGH and SCARBOROUGH TOWN COUNCIL MEMBERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
