Cases 61 - 70 of 75
L. H. et al v. Chino Valley Unified School District
as 5:2012cv01408
Defendant:
Chino Valley Unified School District
Plaintiff:
B. H., L. H. and M. H.
Theresa Thomas, et al v. St Martin Parish
as 12-30850
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THERESA D. THOMAS, on behalf of D M T, on behalf of E J T, on behalf of V A T, ALPHONSE FONTNETTE, on behalf of J F and BENJAMIN C. ROY, on behalf of M H, on behalf of K H
Defendant - Appellant:
SCHOOL BOARD ST MARTIN PARISH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laura Hansen v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 11-2822
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Laura Hansen
Defendant - Appellee:
State of Minnesota, Ann L. Alton, Garry Larson and others
HUBBARD et al v. GEORGE-HUBBARD
as 1:2011cv00657
Defendant:
KAREN LOUISE GEORGE-HUBBARD
Plaintiff:
B. J. H., II, K. M. H. and BYRON J. HUBBARD, I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00715
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Smith v. C.M.F. State Prison, et al
as 2:2010cv02506
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A. Smith
Defendant:
C.M.F. State Prison, C.D.C. and D. M. H.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MH et al v. AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2010cv00088
Plaintiff:
M. H. , M. U. , T. J. and others
Defendant:
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell v. M & H Automotive, Inc.
as 0:2009cv61733
Plaintiff:
Nolan R. Campbell
Defendant:
M & H Automotive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02508
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
