Cases 61 - 69 of 69
Jones v. K&R Nutrition Inc
as 1:2009cv00413
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Jones
Defendant:
K&R Nutrition Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kurita v. State Primary Board of the Tennessee Democratic Party, The et al
as 3:2008cv00948
Plaintiff:
Rosalind Kurita, Rosalind Kurita, Rosalind Kurita and others
Defendant:
State Primary Board of the Tennessee Democratic Party, The, Paula Combs, Larry Mullins and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lee v. Phillips County, Arkansas et al
as 2:2008cv00041
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee
Defendant:
Phillips County, Arkansas and Phillips County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lee v. Phillips County, Arkansas et al
as 2:2008cv00025
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee
Defendant:
Phillips County, Arkansas, Phillips County Sheriff Department, Phillips County Courthouse and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv05929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Breland v. City of Centerville, Georgia et al
as 5:2007cv00027
Plaintiff:
Heather Breland and Heather Breland
Defendant:
City of Centerville, Georgia, City of Centerville, Georgia and Terry Lee Ware, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Kinslow v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2007cv00005
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Kinslow
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Corrections, Larry Warg, Linda Depauw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
