Cases 61 - 70 of 202
Bartz v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 0:2019cv01577
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and U.S Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Jon Bradley Bartz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Shulkin et al
as 1:2019cv00228
Defendant:
Bryan Matthews, U.S. Attorney General, Lowell Hayes and others
Plaintiff:
Dietrich Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
PIERCE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2019cv00045
Defendant:
INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL CURTIS HILL, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM P. BARR and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2019cv20660
Defendant:
STSO, Deputy Federal Security Director, STSO, MIA, G-Band and others
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Demos v. The U.S.A. et al
as 5:2019cv00001
Petitioner:
John Roberts Demos
Respondent:
The U.S. Attorney General, The U.S.A., The U.S. and others
Scott v. Garlock et al (MAG+)
as 2:2018cv00981
Defendant:
Butler County Circuit Clerk, Alabama Attorney General, Wayne Garlock and others
Plaintiff:
Ollie Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv02475
Plaintiff:
D.B. and LOUIS A. BANKS
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FORMER DIRECTOR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS et al v. OFFICE OF CONGRESSIONAL ETHICS et al
as 1:2018cv02413
Defendant:
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DC FEMS and others
Plaintiff:
LOUIS A. BANKS and D. B.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Ryan Gallagher v. Drug Enforcement Agency, et al
as 18-11105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RYAN GALLAGHER
Defendant - Appellee:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and ASHLEY DEMETRA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
