Cases 71 - 80 of 3,424
Mark Blackwell v. Lisa Nocerini, et al
as 24-1186
Plaintiff:
MARK B. BLACKWELL
Defendant:
LISA NOCERINI, RYAN STRONG, FINLEY CARTER and others
Hamilton v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
Charles Hamilton
Defendant:
Victor Hill, Roland Boehrer, Terrance Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SUMMERS v. REMUS et al
as 2:2024cv02060
Plaintiff:
George D summers
Defendant:
HENDRELL REMUS, LEXIE CARTER and MARK GOINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Burnett v. Hawkins et al
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Bayla Burnett
Defendant:
Stephanie Hawkins, Brittany Meaker, Mark Carter Blackledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Porter v. Starks et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Reginald Darnell Porter
Defendant:
Christopher Starks, Mark S Watson, Natalie Bokota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James v. Strogoteanu et al
as 0:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Ervin Lamar James
Defendant:
Darren Mark Ficek, Mihai Strogoteanu and Taylor Joseph Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. The Charles Schwab Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Clark
Defendant:
The Charles Schwab Corporation, The Colorado Division of Securities, The Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henle v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Michael Emile Nicholas Henle
Defendant:
State of Iowa, Joseph R. Biden and Jimmy Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
